is it just me, or had george's face undergone some strange sort of metamorphosis so that he literally and objectively looks a lot stupider now than he did in 2000? I have no vantage point from which I can objectively decide if this is true, or if it's just that my opinion of him has changed so much, and thus my take on his face has morphed. Maybe it's some combination thereof. I mean Clinton seems to look a lot ... older/more tired from 92-2000, but not stupider.
1 comment:
is it just me, or had george's face undergone some strange sort of metamorphosis so that he literally and objectively looks a lot stupider now than he did in 2000? I have no vantage point from which I can objectively decide if this is true, or if it's just that my opinion of him has changed so much, and thus my take on his face has morphed. Maybe it's some combination thereof. I mean Clinton seems to look a lot ... older/more tired from 92-2000, but not stupider.
Post a Comment